Time Paradoxes and Romance
Saturday, September 30th, 2006"…there could have been no two hearts so open,
no tastes so similar, no feelings so in unison, no countenances so beloved.
Now they were as strangers; nay, worse than strangers, for they could
never become acquainted."
.
...........................-from Persuasion (Jane Austen), Chapter 8
.
.
It’s a good thing the north part of Metro Manila got out early from the Luzon-wide brownout issue. Fresh from the wrath of the storm Milenyo, Ethel and I decided on staying at home for the weekend to unwind from a very busy week. But as a couple, our main means of unwinding is to watch a nice romantic movie. Since theatres and malls in Manila will most likely be crowded these days according since people would want to escape from life without electricity and convinience, we decided on meeting both ends- We decided on watching the movie "The Lake House" on DVD in the comforts of our house’s simple entertainment system.
.
The "Lake House" tells the story of a romance that spans years but involves, suprisingly, no nudity, no violence and only a few kisses. The main characters exemplify compassion for those suffering, respect for elders, and love for their family, things the movies and TV have seem to forgotten. It succeeds despite being based on two paradoxes: time travel, and the ability of two people to have conversations that even with the time logic established by the film, probably impossible. Yet it didn’t bother me in the slightest. Take time travel: You could easily get distracted by its logical flaws and contradictory time lines. However, I just decided to simply accept it as a premise, no questions asked and the it worked for me, time travel on an emotional, not temporal, logic.
.
For this movie it works like this. Kate Forster (Sandra Bullock) , a doctor, lives in a glass house built on stilts over a lake north of Chicago. She is moving out and leaves a note for the next tenant, Alex Wyler(Keanu Reeves). He reads the note and replies to her thinking she has the wrong house, because "no one has lived in this house for years." She writes back to disagree. It evolves that he thinks it is 2004 and she thinks it is 2006, and perhaps she moved in after he left, instead of moving out before he arrived, although that wouldn’t fit with — but never mind.
.
This correspondence continues as they leave their letters in the mailbox beside the sidewalk that leads to the bridge that leads to the glass house. No one writes snail mail any more since everyone would choose texting or sending emails instead. And the simple act of writing the letters, sending them, and how the characters saved and cherished them was touching in itself, especially as they learn to love and wait for true love’s mysterious and unpredictable timing.
.
They also have the same dog. That’s never explained but never mind. The key element in "The Lake House" that gives it more than a rueful sense of loss is that although Alex’s letters originate in 2004 and Kate’s in 2006, he is after all still alive in 2006, and what is more, she after all was alive in 2004. Is there a way for them to send letters across the gap that will allow them to meet where she was in 2004, or she where will be in 2006, or vice-versa? It is, although it involves many paradoxes, including the one that in 2004 all of this is ahead of both of them, and in 2006 Alex knows everything but Kate either knows nothing, or knows it too late to act on it. None of this prevents her letter of romantic anguish: That was you that I met!
.
During the movie I’m trying to do the math: It should be possible, given enough ingenuity, for them to eventually spend 2007 together, especially since he can theoretically keep the letters he received from her in 2004 and ask her out on a date and show them to her, although by then she’d know she wrote them — or would she?
.
And there are the other problems in their lives, Reeves is dealing with his father, played by Christopher Plummer, a famous Chicago architect. The old man is an egocentric genius who designed the Lake House, which his son dislikes because, like Louis himself, it lives in isolation; there aren’t even any stairs to get down to the water. Alex is an architect himself, currently debasing himself with suburban condos, and Kate’s lost her father and ended a relationship with someone simply because she was unable to open her heart up to him, to anyone, until she got the letters.
.
In one scene, she writes him from 2006 and asks him to go to a train station on her father’s birthday in 2004 where she had forgotten a book intended for her Dad (now deceased) as a gift. He does, and finds the book, Pursuasion by Jane Austin, as he sees her pulling out on the train. She of course sees only a stranger.
.
Later in the film when she’s asked him not to write her as they can never meet, she discovers the book he’d retrieved for her hidden where she might find it. She opens it up (and it’s noticably worn, like he’s re-read time and again) and she reads the last couple sentences from the 3rd paragraph in Chapter 8 - “…could have been no two hearts so open, no tastes so similar, no feelings so in unison, no countenances so beloved” that he’s bookmarked for her with a dried rose. At that point, Ethel was openly in tears. Me, too.
.
There’s this one scene that I love where Alex invites Kate for a walk in Chicago. This scene shows the brilliance of those involved in the movie’s cinematography, as smooth pastel colors of the windy city was deviced to capture the spirit of the scene. "Kate, I’m here with you. Thanks for the lovely Saturday together." Written on a usual downtown hall, and a sweet smile from her face. Reminds me of those short walks with a good friend along Shaw Boulevard months ago. Although moments like this never really last, it’s good to keep something from those moments that will stay with me in a long time, like how that message were on that Chicago wall.
.
The "first fight" scene was also memorable. Here we see Kate and Alex on two ends of the screen, conversing. It was amazing how the fim makers rendered the possibility of having the two characters, separated by time, metaphorically exchange their thoughts in one place.
.
But enough of the plot and its paradoxes. What I responded to in the movie is its fundamental romantic impulse. It makes us hope these two people will somehow meet, or meet again. The simple act of fate perhaps that brought these two people together, how their lives had intertwined for years without them truly knowing it.
.
You may call it God’s design, or you may call it fate. But there are too many coincidences in the world that bring us to certain places, and people in our lives.
.
I never had any intention of living along one of the Great Lakes. I’m just a boy from the province, who goes to the city everyday to earn a living, meet friends, new and old, and sometimes have fun. One day, while looking far at the Laguna Lake from one of the highest floors in our office building, something nudged me into the moment of decision that shaped my destiny. And here I happily remain years later. And in that time, certain people have happened across my path, and have become so dear to my heart, where for a random day at work, a random trip, I never would have met them at all. Fate - perhaps. But definitely a gift.
.
As for the dog in the movie. well, maybe dogs just live outside time.
.
Note: I regret only one thing after watching the movie- I should have seen this movie first before it’s Korean counterpart "Il Mare". Anyway, the song that’s playing right now is "This Never Happened Before" by Paul McCartney, part of the movie’s soundtrack. Enjoy!







